From Numerical Simulation to the First Telescopic Image
Astronomical observations are about to deliver the very first telescopic image of a giant black hole. The mass of data collected in one night, exceeding everything that has ever been done in any scientific field, should provide a recomposed image during 2018. All this, forty years after the first numerical simulations.
According to the laws of general relativity, black holes are, by definition, invisible. Contrary to uncollapsed stars, their surface is neither a solid nor a gas; it is an intangible frontier known as the event horizon. Beyond this horizon, gravity is so strong that nothing escapes, not even light. Seen projected onto the background of the sky, the event horizon will probably resemble a perfectly black disk if the black hole is static (Schwarzschild black hole) or a slightly flattened disk if it is rotating (Kerr black hole).
A black hole however, be it small and of stellar mass or giant and supermassive, is rarely “bare”; in typical astrophysical conditions, it is usually surrounded by gaseous matter. This matter forms an accretion disk in which highly heated gas emits a characteristic radiation. A giant black hole as can be found in the centre of most galaxies, may also be surrounded by a cluster of stars, the orbital dynamics of which is strongly influenced by it. In essence, a black hole remains invisible, but in its own special way, it lights up the matter it attracts.
Logically, scientists wondered what a black hole lit up by its surrounding matter would look like. Educational or artistic representations can be seen in popular science magazines in the form of a sphere seeming to float in a whirlpool of glowing gas. These images, however forceful, fail to convey the astrophysical reality. It can be described correctly using computer simulations that take account of the complex distortions made by the gravitational field on space-time and on the paths of light rays that follow its fabric. These were used by the first time in 1978 by the author of this article. Today, progress in astronomical observation is about to deliver the first telescopic image of a giant black hole, thanks to the ambitious Event Horizon Telescope programme.
To create the most realistic possible images of a black hole lit up by an accretion disk, not only do we have to calculate the propagation of light rays in the space-time curvature, but we also have to know the physical properties of the accretion disk. In 1978, I was a young scientist at the Paris-Meudon Observatory and did the first accurate numerical simulation of the “photographic” appearance of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by a thin accretion disk. To do so, I used the only computer available at the time at Meudon, an IBM 7040 with transistors, programmable using punched cards. Without a computer visualisation tool, I had to create the final image by hand from the digital data (figure 1).
© Jean-Pierre Luminet
This image appeared first in the November issue of La Recherche (1) and concluded a 1979 article with all equations and technical details, published in the international Astronomy and Astrophysics journal.
DIFFERENCE IN LUMINOSITY
The top of the disk remains visible regardless of the viewing angle - in contrast to the typical views of Saturn’s rings. The gravitational field curves the light rays near the black hole so much that the rear part of the disk is “revealed”. Even if the black hole hides what falls into it, it cannot mask what is behind it. The curving of the light rays also generates a secondary image which allows us to see the other side of the accretion disk, on the opposing side of the black hole from the observer. Very deformed optically, the rear part looks like a thin halo of light against the central black disk, which represents the event horizon enlarged by a factor of 3V3/2 ≈ 2,6 due to the gravitational lens effect.
The main feature of this view of the black hole is the significant difference in luminosity between the various regions of the disk. On the one hand, the light shines maximum in the areas closest to the horizon, as the gas is hottest there. On the other hand, the light received by a distant observer is considerably different from the light emitted, due to the combination of the Einstein and Doppler effects; the first caused by the gravity field, the latter by the rapid rotation of the accretion disk. For a distant observer, the light received is considerably amplified on the side of the image where the gas approaches the observer and is weaker on the side it is moving away from.
The virtual photo of the black hole, calculated “bolometrically” (i.e. taking account of the whole electromagnetic spectrum from the radio to the gamma wave range) is independent of the mass of the black hole and the flow of gas swallowed, on the condition that this remains moderate (in other situations, the structure of the accretion disk may be thick, take the form of a torus, etc.). This image may also therefore describe a stellar black hole 10km in radius, attracting the gas from an accompanying star, or a giant black hole lying at the centre of a galaxy and sucking in the interstellar gas.
This initial digital imaging work on black holes was then developed by numerous scientists, who benefitted from rapid progress in computer performances. Colours were added to the images (according to a specific coding dictated by variations in temperature) and background skies, to make the reconstitutions as realistic as possible. Moreover, the observer is no longer supposedly to be stationary and very distant from the black hole, but moving with it, which introduces a new distortion of the images by the Doppler effect due to the movement of the observer. Finally, the black hole can be animated by a rotating movement, such as in the Kerr solution, the most realistic astrophysical situation. However, although this rotation generates an additional asymmetry - the black hole is no longer spherical - it remains small, even if rotating rapidly.
Of the numerous visualisations created, some of which are visible on the internet, those made at the start of the 1990s by my colleague Jean-Alain Marck at the Paris-Meudon Observatory, in colour and animated, are the most remarkable. We made a film which shows the spectacle that would be seen from the window of a space craft falling freely towards the black hole on various trajectories.
In the autumn of 2014, the world’s media waxed lyrical on the representations of the supermassive black hole, Gargantua, imagined by the film maker, Christopher Nolan, for his film Interstellar. The American astrophysicist Kip Thorne, a renowned specialist in relativistic astrophysics (he received the Nobel Prize for physics in 2017 for his work on gravitational waves), was technical advisor to a team of 200 graphic animation experts, using the most sophisticated calculation and visualisation tools, to model the appearance of a giant black hole measuring one hundred million solar masses, rotating rapidly and surrounded by an accretion disk. The American press headlined the scientific realism of the calculated images, resulting from a “simulation of unprecedented accuracy”. The most captivating view in the film, calculated for an observer located in the plane of the accretion disk (figure 2), while it correctly describes the primary and secondary images distorted by
© Collection Christophel / Warner Bros Entertainment Inc / Paramount Pictures Corporation
the gravitational field, shows uniform luminosity of the disk. In other words, it neglects all the physical effects due to its radiating structure and its rapid rotation. As Kip Thorne explained to me in a private email, the film maker decided that light asymmetry in the image would have been incomprehensible to the spectators! However, it is precisely this strong asymmetry of apparent luminosity that is the main signature of a black hole, the only celestial object able to give the internal regions of an accretion disk a speed of rotation close to the speed of light and to induce a very strong Doppler effect! Slightly embarrassed by this bending of the scientific truth, Thorne and his colleagues subsequently published an image in a technical journal, taking account of the effects of the spectral shift (figure 3), but still based on a non-physical model of the accretion disk.
© Kip Thorne et al. / Classical and Quantum Gravity
Another way of visualising a “bare” black hole (without an accretion disk), is to calculate the gravitational mirage it causes on the background of stars. The most spectacular views, combining scientific accuracy and aesthetics, were obtained in 2006 by Alain Riazuelo, from the Astrophysics Institute of Paris. He calculated the gravitational mirage caused by a black hole passing in front of a background of stars, the disk of our own galaxy or Magellanic clouds.
All these illustrations are virtual images obtained using the equations of general relativity and on more or less realistic physical models.
AN APPLE ON THE MOON
Could we see a black hole directly? If astronomers had a sufficiently powerful telescope, they would be able to directly observe the shadow cast by the event horizon of a black hole and the hot mark of the accretion disk surrounding it. However, several technical challenges prevent the development of such an instrument. The main one is the tiny size of such stars seen from the Earth. The closest known stellar black hole, located in the binary X-ray source A0620-00 in our Galaxy, 3,500 light-years away, has a diameter of just 40 kilometres! So, we have to aim at close, supermassive black holes, knowing that their size is proportional to their mass. The two most promising candidates are Sagittarius A* (abbreviated to Sgr A*), located 26,000 light-years away in the centre of our galaxy, with a mass estimated at 4 million solar masses, and the supergiant M87*, a monster of 6 billion solar masses, lying at the centre of the giant elliptical galaxy of M87, 55 million light-years away. Everything points to the fact that these black holes are surrounded by a rapidly-rotating accretion disk, possibly formed of star debris previously broken up by tidal forces.
In terms of intrinsic size, the event horizons of Sgr A* and M87* are respectively 25 million and 36 billion kilometres in diameter. However, the effect of the gravitational lens caused by the black hole amplifies the apparent size of the event horizon by a factor of 2.6. All calculations done, it appears that the shadows cast by Sgr A* and M87* on the gaseous halos of their accretion disks have an apparent diameter of about 50 microarcseconds. This is the angle under which we would see an apple on the Moon with the naked eye, requiring a resolution 2,000 times greater than that of the Hubble space telescope!
The resolution of a telescope depends on its aperture (the diameter of its lens) and the wavelength at which it is observing. Doubling the aperture would show details twice as accurately. We would thus need a telescope operating in the visible range 2 kilometres in diameter to resolve the images of Sgr A* and M87*; not possible, even in the medium-term. Another difficulty, is that the neighborhoods of black holes remain hidden from our view in most frequency bands of the electromagnetic spectrum. The galaxy centres where they lie are buried under dense clouds of dust that block out most of the radiation. To pierce through this fog, the wavelength needs to be increased.
A LONG WAIT
Thus, at the millimetre wavelengths typical in radioastronomy, galaxy centres become almost transparent. Problem: when the wavelength is doubled, resolution is divided by two, such that the size of the telescopes needs to be increased further. So, to be able to observe the central black hole in our galaxy in the millimetre domain, we would need a radiotelescope about 5,000 km in diameter... Impossible? Not at all, because at these wavelengths, astronomers can use very large base interferometry (VLBI), a technique that combines several observatories into a single virtual telescope with an aperture as large as the distance that separates them. A terrestrial-sized VLBI network is therefore just sensitive enough to resolve an image as small as 50 microseconds of arc angle. This is how the EHT (Event Horizon Telescope) project was designed in the first decade of this century, combining millimetric radiotelescopes across the planet in a network, in the hope of capturing the first “real” images of giant black holes.
Once the concept was put forward, it then just had to be achieved, despite a multitude of observational and technical constraints. For example, weather conditions need to “cooperate” so that the VLBI network can avail of crystal skies simultaneously at eight places on four continents, as observations are not possible in the rain. The 1.3 mm wavelength at which the signals are detected is absorbed and emitted by water. Another constraint is imposed by the use of the Alma telescope in Chile, the most requested observatory in the world. Ultimately, the EHT teams only had a two-week window each year in which to attempt the group observations. They had to wait until April 2017 to have four full, clear nights, two for Sgr A* and two for M87*. However, there was no question of seeing an image directly on a screen! Building a high-resolution image by VLBI requires the combination of the signals captured by the various network aerials. To do so, atomic clocks are used to measure the arrival time of the signals to one tenth of a billionth of a second, compare them in real time and triangulate with their point of origin to reconstitute an overall image. With eight observatories spread around the globe, including in places with poor internet links, the EHT scientists had to record the data separately and store them on hard disks to combine them subsequently.
The mass of data collected exceeded anything that had ever been done in all scientific fields together: one night of observation collected 2 petabytes of data, as much as in one complete year of experiments at the LHC, the CERN large-hadron collider that led to the discovery of the Higgs-Englert boson in 2012, following analysis of 4 million billion proton-proton collisions...
The hard disks of data stored in Antarctica then had to wait until December and the end of the long glacial winter, to be transported in secure flight conditions to join the several thousand hard disks centralised at the MIT Haystack Observatory in Massachusetts and the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn. There, clusters of supercomputers started to process the mountain of data, a task that will take several months to obtain just a few pixels of image of the massive black holes at the centre of the Milky Way and the furthest galaxy, M87.
The results will probably not be published until later in 2018. But, as suggested by the digital simulations recently done by the EHT scientists, the recomposed image obtained should resemble a brilliant crescent surrounding a black disk, placed on the side where the hot spot of the accretion disk is moving towards the observer.
As could already be predicted from our simulations forty years ago (figure 1), by squinting
your eyes to reduce the ocular resolution, the clear outline of a black hole surrounded by its accretion disk is indeed the black silhouette of its event horizon surrounded by the brilliant spot of the disk amplified by the Doppler effect! A very different, although improbable result, would mean that general relativity is incorrect in very strong gravitational fields, and new physics would be necessary.
NEW PHASE
As well as the hope of capturing the first “photos” of black holes, EHT astrophysicists hope to garner a lot of information that will enable them to better understand the very special physics that reign in the environment close to black holes, namely the gigantic jets of particles and radiation that some project into space at speeds close to that of the speed of light. This is the case for M87*, where the jets are larger than the galaxy itself. If Sgr A* produces jets, they are too small or not bright enough to be detected until now. The jets play an important role in the evolution of galaxies; for example, by heating interstellar space, they can prevent cooling of the gas that allows stars to form. The most probable physical explanation is that they are produced by the twisted magnetic fields associated with black holes, fed in energy either by an accretion disk, or by conversion of some of the rotational energy of the black holes themselves. EHT telescopes are able to record the polarisation of the radiation emitted by the accretion disk of the galactic black hole SgrA* and to draw up the map of the magnetic field near its event horizon, which would perhaps reveal the physical mechanisms at the origin of the jets. VLBI observations in 2015 started to provide some clues as to the structure of Sgr A*’s magnetic field, hinting at the hypothesis of a rapidly rotating black hole.
An accurate description of black holes and their immediate environment still promises even more spectacular developments in the near future, thanks to a set of very different instruments and methods. The optical interferometer Gravity, being built at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) at the European Southern Observatory in Chile, and the next generation of optical telescopes in the 30 metre diameter class, will be able to follow the stars around Sgr A* orbiting at only a few hundred times the radius of the black hole, and measure the precession of their pericentres to deduce the angular momentum (spin) of the black hole. The radio interferometer SKA (Square Kilometer Array), built in South Africa and Australia, will be able to follow the orbits of pulsars around the galactic black hole, timing them ultra-precisely to test their properties. The Lisa spatial interferometer (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna), once in orbit, will be used to capture the gravitational waves emitted when small compact objects turn around supermassive black holes in nearby galaxies.
Relativistic astrophysics, still in its infancy in the 1970s due to a lack of experimental resources, is now entering a golden age. Already with the EHT, by capturing the signals of what is happening immediately close to a supermassive black hole, astrophysicists will be able to test Einstein’s theory of general relativity in the most extreme conditions. These measurements will complete historical detections of gravitational waves from 2015, produced when pairs of stellar-mass black holes collide, providing the best evidence so far of the existence of black holes. EHT data will be able to give us the final proof.
(1) B. Carter et J.-P. Luminet, La Recherche n° 94, p. 944, 1978.
A PLANETARY NETWORK
The idea of creating a worldwide network to observe the black hole at the centre of the galaxy started in 1999 at the initiative of the Dutch astronomer Heino Falcke, today at Nimègue University in the Netherlands. It was further developed by various radioastronomy groups, which merged in 2006 into the EHT consortium. Gradually, the network grew to include several observatories to gain planetary reach. The eight radioastronomical stations currently in the network include Iram in Spain, the Large Millemeter Telescope (LMT) in Mexico, the Submillimeter Telescope (SMT) in Arizona, the James Clark Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) and the Submillimeter Array (SMA) in Hawaii, the South Pole Telescope (SPT) in Antarctica, the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (Alma) and the Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (Apex) in Chile. Each of these instruments is located at altitude to reduce the atmospheric absorption of the signals. The whole set creates a virtual observatory with a 5,000-km aperture. Other observatories -the Greenland Telescope Project, in Greenland, and the Iram Noema interferometer, on the Bure plateau in the French Alps - will extend the network further and improve its performances.
> AUTHOR
Jean Pierre Luminet
Astrophysicist
Director of Research at the CNRS, Jean-Pierre Luminet specialises in black holes and cosmology. He conducts his research between the Laboratory for the Universe and Theory at the Paris Observatory in Meudon and the Laboratory of Astrophysics in Marseille.
